~This essay previously appeared in Dogwood: A Journal of Prose
and Poetry (2013).
In
the field of foreclosure we measure our days by cities and houses: the condo
and the house in Coeur D’Alene, Idaho, on Monday, the two-story farmhouse in
Washougal, Washington, on Tuesday and Wednesday, “The Shack” in Fairfield,
Idaho; from Thursday thru Saturday, a 1600-square-foot million-dollar condo in
Big Sky, Montana on Sunday, and there will be many others coming up, each
vacant.
My
father has said it’s like we’re living the Jonny Cash version of the song “I’ve
Been Everywhere,” or I’ve said it’s like we’re living that song on the road, or
we’ve both made the comparison. There’s some truth to the analogy—we’re always
totin’ packs as the song goes—except our travels are limited to States within
the Pacific Northwest: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming. We might as
well be driving across the country and back again, however, on account of all
miles we tally between these properties.
“We
trashout foreclosures,” is the answer I give when people ask what my father and
I do on the road, but to “trashout” a house is to remove everything it
contains, even the appliances in some cases, and that’s not always why we’re
dispatched to a foreclosed property.
What
we actually do at each property depends upon its accompanying work order. In
the process we call the “trashout”, we clean the houses, winterize or
de-winterize them, change the locks, and do landscaping. Or we might “refresh”
a house that’s already been emptied (dust and sweep and make new vacuum tracks)
or we might mow a lawn. The yard at the house in Great Falls, Montana, our
current destination, is overdue for mowing, so that’s why we’re going
there—even though the grass (if there actually is any) is probably dead, even
though the mower’s blade will merely spit dust and gravel and litter at me as
it spins.
*
These
houses often hold stories, and on the road between them we hazard
reconstruction, piecing together a plot of sorts based on the so-called “trash”
we’ve hauled to the dump as well as whatever we might have stuffed in our
pockets as though it was a souvenir (a receipts, a note, a piece of old mail)
as though it were a souvenir, as well as from what nosy neighbors divulge to us
over fences about who, what, and why.
Those
who lived in the house overlooking Coeur d’ Alene shouldn’t have chanced to
renovate, probably. Those who lived in the farmhouse in Washougal gambled and
boozed, and maybe they shouldn’t have gone to Disneyland or taken that
Caribbean cruise. “The Shack” in Fairfield was “a façade.” The neighbor told us
the family who lived there borrowed against the property to fix it up but
didn’t get much further than re-siding its exterior.
That
they used the extra cash to buy a big new truck was corroborated not only by
that neighbor’s report but also by what I found in a file folder in the piles
of debris in the living room: two 8-by-5 glossy photographs of a young man
posing in front of a shiny, jacked up pickup with huge tires and custom door
handles shaped like flames.
A
monster-truck of a getaway.
Where’d
they go?
I’m
twenty-six years old and I’m a writer, or I want to be, in my other life, but
here in the field of foreclosure I’ve become a tourist, if only by default—or
I’m foreclosure’s paparazzo, a voyeur of loss.
My
father’s hands grip the steering wheel, and I sit beside him in the passenger’s
seat beside him, shoes off, pen in hand, keeping a record in my notebook the
best I can—where we’ve been, where we’re going, the landscape in between:
mountains, hills, hayfields, sage.
“Get
the trees,” my father says, interrupting my record-keeping.
He
gestures beyond my window and then reaches for a cigarette without taking his
eyes off the road. The trees look charred, fire-scarred to me. They’re not, my
father explains, holding his own flame between his fingers, taking a drag.
He
tells me disease is coloring the trees that way.
Beetles
or worms or fungus, he hypothesizes, when I ask the pathogen of the disease. “Or
they need for a damn good fire,” he says.
He
says it could be the Forest Service’s practice of putting out fires that’s
perpetuated the disease, and he says something else, too, something about the
“inundation of developments,” the construction of homes. “Maybe not in my
lifetime, but in yours, probably,” he finally says, “this forest will be gone.”
I
guess he wants proof that he saw the end coming.
I
roll down my window and zoom toward the trees, trying not to think about things
like disease, trying not to think about that future time when my father won’t
be with me, how it’s probably more than the decay of a forest I’m capturing.
*
When
I’m not taking photographs or recording notes in the passenger’s seat that July
I’m reading. The Dalai Lama’s Essence of the Heart Sutra and Bill
Bryson’s A Short History of Nearly Everything are among the books I’ve
been carrying with me as though they are travel guides, as though they might
teach me how to interpret the scenes I’ve been documenting. The Dalai Lama says
there’s no such thing as permanence, that our tendency to believe otherwise
leads to human suffering. Such an insight seems especially apt in amid the
aftermath of foreclosure.
I
make notes in the margins of that text, but I can’t retain the meaning for
long, and some of the phrases the Dalai Lama uses are beyond me. The
self-existence of things? If I’m a Buddhist at all, I’m a failing one.
Though
a bit more “grounded” than The Essence of the Heart Sutra, Bryson’s book
is no less baffling to me. His awe for the origin of the universe and for the
fortitude of the human race is tempered by something I’ve interpreted as doom.
Some
chapters hint at an inevitability of obliteration that heightens my own dawning
awareness that, as Bryson says, “We live in a world that doesn’t altogether
want us.”
*
“The
trees might be the least of our worries,” I say, capping my camera, reaching
for a cigarette of my own.
I
tell my father Yellowstone is overdue. Old Faithful has wannabes, and that
there’s no way of predicting when a new geyser might sprout up. I tell him we
wouldn’t want to be there when a new geyser does emerge.
The
signs aren’t lying: we really ought to watch for falling rocks.
I
point to the sky, and I tell my father about the asteroids out there we cannot
see, how hundreds of them, at any given moment, are crossing paths with Earth’s
orbit, hauling ass through space at some sixty-six thousand miles per hour, and
how even the smallest of them, “house-sized,” Bryson suggests, could destroy a
city.
“Just
like that!” I say.
But
I don’t know which is more unnerving, the threat of asteroids or what Bryson
says about the moon—that the moon is what keeps Earth spinning but how “this
won’t go on forever.” I read aloud, pointing to the text I’ve underlined:
“Without the Moon’s steadying influence, the Earth would wobble like a dying
top.” Sure, it might not be for two billion years or more that the moon will
fail us, I explain, but that doesn’t mean I don’t find the scenario as
unsettling as the diseased trees right outside the window.
“Talk
about foreclosure,” I say.
My
father shoots me a look I probably should have anticipated, like there’s
nothing to worry about, like the V8 engine beneath the hood of this pickup
could out-drive an asteroid, goddamn it—his drag-racing days weren’t for
naught—and even if the moon did up and fall from the sky right then and there,
we’d stop on the side of the highway and figure out a way to put it back where
it belongs.
Or
maybe that’s just what I hope my father is thinking, what I want to
believe—that here on the road we’re in control, that we could jerry-rig the
moon if need be, that together we could keep this planet, this home we all
share, from wobbling.
But
maybe that is a belief each of my books is challenging—there are forces at work
beneath us and beyond us that none of us can control. It’s a wonder we continue
to exist at all, let alone that we dare learn the word home.
*
Maybe
that 2002 Chevy pickup in the photographs I found in Fairfield, Idaho, was
taking its driver someplace better—that’s the sort of scenario I prefer to
imagine as I “read” these remnants of home I’ve salvaged and taken with me.
Chevrolet campaigns suggest that could be the case when it comes to an “exodus:”
“Live Better,” “Like a Rock,” “For all Life’s roads,” “An American Revolution.”
Leave
Foreclosure in the Dust.
Drive
a Chevy.
But
where does that leave this Dodge that buoys my father and me?
I
think back to a time when there were no roads—how this terrain might have been
underwater once—and it starts to feel as though we’re sailing, my father’s
hands at the helm, his eyes unwavering upon the horizon.
I
pick up my camera again, and I photograph my father’s profile, and then I
photograph the shoulder of the road, the shadow we’re casting there.
The
wind of our momentum whorls through the cab, brushes against my arms and face.
I can feel our tires turning, the engine churning, this Dodge our get-away,
until we reach the next destination.
I
hold the camera in front of my own face next.
I
press the button.
*****
THE STORY BEHIND
THE ESSAY
Set primarily in the cab of my father’s pickup as we drove between the
foreclosed homes banks dispatched us to empty and clean in July of 2009, this
essay was inspired by my desire to capture some of the ways I tried to make
sense of what I perceive to be the complexly metaphorical nature of our labor.
I was interested in the way foreclosure and our labor within foreclosures
resonate with themes like displacement/impermanence (and the transience, or
in-between-ness, that often follows) that define aspects of human condition at
large, particularly in the context of the Great Recession and the mortgage
crisis. On a relatively more personal level, I was interested in how the labor
my father and I were doing in that context illustrates the displacement/impermanence
and transience that defines our relationship. I wanted to make a record of the
scenes my father and I encountered in the field of foreclosure. I also wanted
to make a record of my instinct and struggle to reckon with the significance of
those scenes, not only to my father and me, but also to a collective memory of
the zeitgeist.
*****
ABOUT S.J. DUNNING
S.J. Dunning lives in Tacoma, WA, where she teaches online for Central
Washington University’s Online Professional and Creative Writing Program. Her
other essays on the subject of foreclosure include “for(e)closure,” which won Creative Nonfiction’s 2011 MFA
Program-Off Contest, and “Preserve and Protect,” which appeared in the August
2016 issue of The Sun. She is
currently working on a memoir called What
Remains: Notes from the Field of Foreclosure, which is also about her
experiences emptying and cleaning foreclosed homes with her father throughout
the Pacific Northwest, as well as on a collection of poems about her coming of
age as a writer called How to Make a
Crown. When she’s not teaching or writing, she edits and designs 5x5 Literary Magazine, an online
publication of poetry and prose of 500 words or less. To learn more her
publications and thoughts on the creative process, please visit her website and
blog at http://www.notesfromthefieldofforeclosure.com/.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.